Lufthansa City Airlines publishes concrete A220 First Officer requirements, but two first-party job descriptions disagree about the type rating. On November 8, 2026, the dedicated Lufthansa City A220 Career Center listing said 500 flight hours on CS-25 aircraft and A220 Type Rating preferred. The Lufthansa Group A220 posting 123859, also reachable, says A320/A220 Type Rating and 500 hours.
These are not interchangeable words: preferred and required can lead to opposite eligibility decisions. Ask recruitment to confirm which vacancy and its current wording apply before buying a rating or declining to apply.
Independence: ATCPracticeTest.com is not Lufthansa City Airlines, Lufthansa CityLine, Lufthansa Aviation Training or PASS. This page independently compares official recruitment with a third-party commercial preparation course.
Start with the actual Lufthansa City vacancy, not an airline-wide test list
On a narrow screen, swipe horizontally. Keyboard users can focus and scroll this comparison.
| Official source or route | Publicly stated evidence | Candidate implication |
|---|---|---|
| Lufthansa City Career Center A220 First Officer | 500h on CS-25 aircraft, A220 type rating preferred, EASA pilot licence and Class I medical | Rating preference is not written as a universal hard minimum on that listing |
| Lufthansa Group A220 posting 123859 | A220/A320 type rating and 500h CS-25, with the same core medical and licence provisions | Check whether the specific posting has a stricter filter or older wording |
| Other Lufthansa Group or CityLine roles | Different employer, fleet, route or rank | Do not transfer City Airlines A220 rules automatically |
| General Lufthansa Aviation Training pilot assessment | Generic third-party/airline assessment service: personal, theory and simulator components | Not confirmation that every Lufthansa City applicant sits that exact sequence |
| PASS Lufthansa City course | IP-BQ Basic Qualification plus interviews, reasoning, mathematics, physics and simulator modules | Vendor catalogue is not a current employer-issued summons or pass standard |
The A220 job advertisement is a professional direct-entry position, not a zero-hour cadet course. The publicly listed application link does not guarantee a vacancy remains open after this review. Check the application status, location and conditions immediately before applying.
Qualifications to confirm before choosing a practice provider
On mobile, swipe horizontally. Keyboard users can scroll this focused table.
| Criterion | Employer's stated entry requirement | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Flight experience | At least 500 total hours on CS-25 aircraft in the reviewed A220 postings | 500 hours on unrelated lighter types is not automatically equivalent |
| Pilot licence | EASA CPL(A)/IR(A) with ATPL theory credit and MCC; alternatively MPL with Phase 4 completed | Verify licence/rating currency and the exact vacancy wording |
| Medical | Medical Class I | A preparation score cannot overcome medical ineligibility |
| Advanced training | Advanced UPRT under EASA.FCL.745 | Confirm accredited completion and documentation |
| English | At least ICAO Language Proficiency Level 4, spoken and written competence | No universal PASS English test module is established by this criterion |
| Education | Higher education entrance qualification or accepted equivalent | Document equivalency where needed |
| Residency and work rights | EU citizenship or unrestricted residence/work permit, valid unrestricted travel document | Employer work-right conditions apply regardless of test preparation |
| Previous Group assessment | Recognition of Lufthansa Group selection procedures is possible | Only the recruiter can decide whether a prior assessment counts |
The distinction between Lufthansa City Airlines and Lufthansa CityLine matters. Different Lufthansa Group members can use different aircraft and entry routes; one team’s previous selection does not automatically exempt a candidate from the new employer’s process.
What is and is not confirmed about the test sequence
The Lufthansa City A220 posting says selection follows City Airlines standards, and prior Group selection may be recognised. It does not publish a permanent nine-test IP-BQ checklist, named cut score, fixed simulator profile or universal assessment-provider schedule.
The Lufthansa Aviation Training general Pilot Assessment service illustrates a professional assessment with personal impression, theoretical test and simulator component. That is a general service; it must not be passed off as the exact Lufthansa City selection day without a matching invitation.
PASS IP-BQ: supplier modules, not airline policy
The PASS Lufthansa City product displayed “Last Update: 8 November 2026” during the live audit. It advertises IP-BQ Basic Qualification aptitude and reasoning, IP-BQ mathematics, physics, English, personality, group exercise, HR interview and simulator preparation, plus broad ATPL and Airbus study libraries.
That breadth may be useful after the invitation confirms relevant modules. But a PASS product does not demonstrate which parts of IP-BQ apply to each direct-entry profile, whether previous Lufthansa Group grading is accepted, or whether a particular aircraft simulator is used.
Affiliate disclosure and exact Lufthansa City PASS product
This guide contains a sponsored affiliate referral. We may earn a commission on eligible purchases at no additional cost to you. The employer-comparison findings are independent of that commission.
The branded destination returned HTTP 200 on November 8. It is not an airline-endorsed application, official exam or guarantee of selection.
Three original decision exercises
These are original editorial scenarios, not Lufthansa City internal IP-BQ tasks, confidential interview prompts or simulator evaluations.
Example 1 - type-rating wording
A candidate sees “A220 Type Rating preferred” on the Lufthansa City Career Center, but “A220/A320 Type Rating and 500h” on a Lufthansa Group job description. Is it safe to declare the type rating universally compulsory?
Reveal the source distinction
Answer: no. Two first-party ads have different wording. The exact active vacancy and a written recruitment clarification determine whether the rating is mandatory for that candidate.
Example 2 - hours in the wrong aircraft category
A fictional pilot has 550 total hours, of which only 320 are on CS-25 aircraft. Does that automatically meet a published 500h CS-25 requirement?
Reveal the hours calculation
Answer: no. Total flying time is not the same as hours on qualifying CS-25 aircraft. On the facts given, the pilot is short by 180 qualifying hours.
Example 3 - previous Lufthansa assessment
A pilot previously passed a Lufthansa Group screening and assumes Lufthansa City must waive all remaining tests, because a vacancy says recognition is possible. Is that guaranteed?
Reveal the recognition rule
Answer: no. “Possible” leaves acceptance to Lufthansa City and the actual campaign. Confirm which assessments, if any, are recognised before buying practice.
What to do before the assessment
First, open the Lufthansa City A220 Career Center role and the Lufthansa Group vacancy 123859, record which page the application uses and resolve the type-rating discrepancy.
Second, prepare your logbook summary for the 500h CS-25 condition, EASA licence and IR, MCC/MPL, Class I, Advanced UPRT, English evidence and work rights. Ask whether earlier Group screening may be recognised.
Third, use the interview or test invitation to choose relevant study: PASS Aon/cut-e overview, independent PASS review and KLM’s distinct pilot route provide comparisons, not permissions to ignore official standards.
Primary and supplier references
- Lufthansa City Airlines - dedicated First Officer A220 listing; type rating preferred.
- Lufthansa Group - A220 posting 123859; A220/A320 type rating and 500h wording.
- Lufthansa Aviation Training - generic professional pilot assessment.
- PASS - Lufthansa City commercial course last updated November 8, 2026.
Published August 1, 2026. Reviewed November 8, 2026. Both vacancy descriptions were reachable from Shlomiracle. Their type-rating difference is documented rather than silently resolved; candidates must verify the operative job posting.